Acarbose may indirectly prevent the occurrence of cardiac problems

0
Acarbose may

Acarbose may

Acarbose may indirectly prevent cardiac problems by controlling metabolic parameters and reducing inflammatory markers.

Noushin Khalili and Alireza Safavipour

 

Results:

Acarbose
Table 1: Acarbose effect on Inflammatory markers before and after Intervention

BackgInterventionolic syndrome (MetS) refers to a cluster of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. This study aims to assess the effects of Acarbose as an antihyperglyacarboseent (drug) on late complications of MetS.

Table 2: Effect on Body weight and Waist circumference

Data shown mean±SD; CRP: C-reactive protein; FMD: Flow-mediated dilation; IMT: Intima-media thickness; EFT: Epicardial fat thickness; MetS: Metabolic syndrome; WC: Waist circumference; CVD: Cardiovascular diseases; CV: Cardiovascular

Methods:

This double-masked randomized clinical trial was done on patients with MetS admitted to Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center. They were assigned randomly to two groups: A, who received Acarbose (n = 32) and groupAcarboseeceived a placebo (n = 42) for 6 months. Cardiovascular indexes including flow-mediated dilation (FMD), intima-media thickness (IMT), epicardial fat thickness (EFT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at baseline and 6 months after the treatment and compared between the two groups.

Results:

Post-intervention mean weight (mean difference: −2.5 ± 0.89), and abdominal obesity (mean difference: −2.2 ± 0.64) in the acarbose group were significantly decreased (P value < 0.001). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) level in the acarbose group was considerably higher than the control group (44.7 ± 7.6 vs.. 41.1 ± 6.4; P value = 0.043), while the other metabolic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (P value > 0.05). In both groups, CRP and EFT decreased substantially after the Intervention. Intervention CRP, EFT, and IMT markers in the acarbose group were significantly lower than in the control group (P value < 0.05).

Conclusions:

The administration of Acarbose in patients with MAcarbosedecreasedand decreased decrease decreases obesity, obesity inflammatory, and cardiovascular markers, including CRP, EFT, and IMand increases rdsAcarbosecardiovascularC-reactive protein, an inflammatory markermetabolic syndromeobesity

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) refers to a group of metabolic risk factors associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and type 2 diabetes; these factors include abdominal obesity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance. The prevalence of MetS increases with age from lower than 10% in young adults to nearly 40% in people over 60.[] It is estimated that 20–25% of the world’s population suffers from MetS disorders. MetS is more prevalent in the Asian population. There has been growing evidence suggesting that the inflammatory markers are the main causes of macro- and microvascular, including renal, ophthalmic, and cardiac, complications in patients with MetS who stuff have diabetes plasma concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, is elevated in obese patients and is correlated with the MetS and decreases with weight loss. CRP is produced by mature adipocytes in adipose tissue and may contribute to the elevated circulating plasma CRP concentrations in obese patients and people with the Mets. Treatment of the MetS is aimed at improving insulin resistance through lifestyle changes, namely weight loss and regular physical activity. In patients with abnormal glucose concentrations, dyslipidemia, or hypertension, treatment of the individual components of the syndrome may result in a greater impact on reducing overall CVD risks. Given the prevalence of the MetS and the exaggerated CVD risks, innovative therapeutic approaches continue to evolve.

Studies have shown that even in patients without diabetes, each of the MetS’ risk factors, such as obesity, can increase inflammatory markers’ levels and cardiovascular adverse events. Ceriello and colleagues have shown that postprandial hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia are associated with an increase in plasma levels of nitrotyrosine and inflammatory and thrombogenic biomarkers such as IL-6, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2. They showed that postprandial dysmetabolism was accompanied by oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients as well.

Many antidiabetic medications are only effective in glycemic control and have slight or no effect on inflammatory markers and cardiovascular adverse events.[,] Acarbose is an alpha-glucosAcarbosenhibito, a group of antidiabetic agents that is poorly absorbed. Acarbose is associated with lesser gastrointestinal side effects compared to other alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and was used as a single drug or in combination with other antidiabetic medications to control blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Acarbose can lower HbA1C levels by 0.5–1% and can reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in prediabetic patients by 36%. This medication can reduce serum lipid levels, body weight, and blood pressure and ease inflammatory markers and cardiovascular complications. This study compares the effect of Acarbose and placebo on infacarbosey markers and cardiovascular indexes in MetS patients among the Iranian population.

Methods

This double-masked, randomized clinical trial was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials with the code IRCT20130924014752N5. The research population included all the patients with MetS referred to the Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center between August 2016 and August 2017. Among them, 84 patients with MetS based on American Heart Association criteria and the endocrinologist’s opinions were selected using a nonrandom convenience sampling. The patients were evaluated regarding their height and weight, and after calculating BMI (BMI = weight/height2, weight [kg] and height [cm]), cases with BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 were included. Patients with a history of underlying diseases such as respiratory diseases and rheumatoid arthritis, those taking antidiabetic or lipid-lowering medication over the past year, those using a low-calorie diet to reduce weight over the past year, and patients with a history of drug abuse or cases of unwillingness to continue the study of intolerance of high drug dosage and complications were excluded from the study. After obtaining written consent from qualified patients, they were divided into two groups of 42 patients receiving Acarbose and a placebo using Acarbosellocation software.

At baseline, demographic information such as age, sex, and BMI, as well as metabolic parameters including body weight and waist circumference (WC), fasting blood sugar (FBS), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), CRP marker, and cardiovascular markers including flow-mediated dilation (FMD), intima-media thickness (IMT), and epicardial fat thickness (EFT) were measured and recorded. FMD, IM, and pericardial fat thickness were measured via two-dimensional M-mode echocardiography. Endothelial function was assessed as FMD at the brachial artery. It should be noted that cardiovascular markers were measured by a cardiologist using Doppler ultrasonography . For patients in the acarbose group, treatment was initiated with 25 mg/day of Acarbose in the first week. If the dosage was safe and well-tolerated, it was increased by 25 mg/daweeklyek to a maximum dose of 100 mg/day within a month. The dosage was increased to 300 mg/day for 3 months and maintained for the second 3 months (6 months). Patients in the control group also received placa ebo in the same manner, and they took these medications with their main meal to reduce gastrointestinal complications.

Response to treatment was considered if at least 5% weight loss was achieved during the 6-month follow-up period, but if the patients had serious complications, they were excluded from the study. There were no severe drug side effects suc hasas dehydration or elevated creatininlevelsly 10 patients were excluded from the acarbose group due to mild complications such as abdominal bloating, diarrhea and stool softening, antolerancece to increased drug dosage r, unwillingness to continue thanticipationon [Figure 1].

What are the preventative care for diabetes?

[1]Khalili N, Safavipour A. Evaluation of the Effects of Acarbose on Weight and Metabolic, Inflammatory, and Cardiovascular Markers in Patients with Obesity and Overweight. Int J Prev Med. 2020 Sep 5;11:140. Doi: Doi.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_229_19

References

1. Limberg JK, Morgan BJ, Schrage WG. Peripheral blood flow regulation in human obesity and metabolic syndrome. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2016;44:116–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
2. Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, Bloomgarden ZT, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology guidelines for managing dyslipidemia and preventing cardiovascular disease. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(Suppl 2):1–87. [PubMed] []
3. Han TS, Lean ME. A clinical perspective of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;5:2048004016633371. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
4. Verma P, Srivastava RK, Jain D. Association of lifestyle risk factors with metabolic syndrome components: A cross-sectional study in Eastern India. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:6. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
5. Lau DC, Yan H, Dhillon B. Metabolic syndrome: A marker of patients at high cardiovascular risk. Can J Cardiol. 2006;22:85B–90B. [PMC free article] [PubMed[Google Scholar]
6. Esser N, L’Homme L, De Roover A, Kohnen L, Scheen AJ, Moutschen M, et al. Obesity phenotype is related to NLRP3 inflammasome activity and visceral adipose tissue immunological profile. Diabetologia. 2013;56:2487–97. [PubMed[]
7. Yamagishi S. Cardiovascular disease in recent-onset diabetes mellitus. J Cardiol. 2011;57:257–62. [PubMed[]
8. Agrawal NK, Kant S. Targeting inflammation in diabetes: Newer therapeutic options. World J Diabetes. 2014;5:697–710. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]
9. Ceriello A, Giacomello R, Stel G, Motz E, Taboga C, Tonutti L, et al. Hyperglycemia-induced thrombin formation in diabetes: The possible role of oxidative stress. Diabetes. 1995;44:924–8. [PubMed[]
10. Esser N, Paquot N, Scheen AJ. Anti-inflammatory agents to treat or prevent type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2015;24:283–307. [PubMed] []
11. Younk LM, Lamos EM, Davis SN. Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetes drugs. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2016;15:1239–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]
12. Singla RK, Singh R, Dubey AK. Important aspects of post-prandial antidiabetic drug, acarbose. Curr Top Med Chem. 2016;16:65–70. [PubMed[]
13. Yamagishi S, Nakamura K, Takeuchi M. Inhibition of postprandial hyperglycemia by Acarbose is a promising theAcarbose strategy for treating patients with embolic syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2005;65:152–4. [PubMed] []
14. Tsai SS, Chu YY, Chen ST, Chu PH. A comparison of different definitions of metabolic syndrome for the risks of atherosclerosis and diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10:5613. [PMC free article] [PubMed[]

About Post Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *